Skip to main content

Table 10 Answers of participants evaluating the influence of locations on review outcomes

From: Investigating the effectiveness of peer code review in distributed software development based on objective and subjective data

Outcome Much worse (1.0) Worse (2.0) No Infl. (3.0) Better (4.0) Much better (5.0) Unable to Resp. Min Max Med M SD
Duration 15 22 6 0 0 2 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.8 0.7
Participation 6 14 17 3 1 4 1.0 5.0 3.0 2.5 0.9
Comments 2 8 17 12 2 4 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.1 0.9