Skip to main content

Table 1 Influence factors and review outcomes investigated by previous studies

From: Investigating the effectiveness of peer code review in distributed software development based on objective and subjective data

Influence factors

Absence of discussion

Comment usefulness

Feedback delay

Participation in review

Post-release defects

Review duration

Review iterations

Review quality

Amount of previous defects

♣

 

♣

⋆

   

⋆

Affected modules

     

â™ 

  

Author experience

   

♣

 

â™ 

  

Author’s company

     

â™ 

  

Bug fix or new feature

  

♣

   

â–ł

 

Commit message size

♣

       

External reviewers

 

♢

      

Length of prior discussions

♣

   

♡

   

Number of authors

♣

 

♣

     

Number of reviewers

♣

       

Patch size (Files)

♣

♢

      

Patch size (LOC)

     

â™ 

â–ł

 

Prior feedback delay

  

♣

     

Priority

     

â™ 

  

Review coverage

    

♡†

   

Review speed

    

♡

   

Reviewer experience

 

♢

   

â™ 

  

Source code type

 

♢

      
  1. ♣Thongtanunam et al. (2016a)
  2. ♢Bosu et al. (2015)
  3. ♡McIntosh et al. (2014)
  4. â™ Baysal et al. (2016)
  5. â–łBeller et al. (2014)
  6. ⋆Thongtanunam et al. (2015a)
  7. †Shimagaki et al. (2016)